The Pros and Cons of a Visitor’s Guide: A DMO Perspective
As tourism professionals, we know a visitor’s guide is more than just a brochure—it’s a storytelling tool, a first impression, and a cornerstone of many Destination Marketing Organization (DMO) strategies. But in today’s digital-first, user-review-driven world, it’s worth taking a fresh look at both the strengths and limitations of the traditional DMO-produced visitor guide.
Here’s a breakdown that might help us think like a visitor—and refine how we approach this valuable but evolving resource.
What Works Well
1. Authority and Trust
When done right, a visitor guide serves as an authoritative source of truth about the destination. It provides curated content that reflects deep local knowledge, seasonal trends, and community assets—things that generic travel platforms often miss. Visitors trust this kind of content, especially when it’s presented in a polished, professional way.
2. A Beautiful, Unified Brand Message
DMOs have the advantage of controlling the narrative. A well-designed guide can reinforce a destination’s brand voice, showcase aspirational photography, and create cohesion across campaigns. It offers an opportunity to highlight the “hero” experiences that define a place—and make travelers want to be part of the story.
3. Easy Access to the Essentials
Visitors want convenience. A guide that brings together accommodations, restaurants, attractions, and maps into one place can streamline trip planning and reduce friction. For many, especially older travelers or those planning in advance, it’s a welcome change from bouncing between tabs and social platforms.
Where It Falls Short
1. Pay-to-Play Limitations Let’s be honest—many guides are driven by stakeholder funding models, where only paying partners make it into the pages. While this helps with cost recovery, it can unintentionally exclude some of the most authentic or emerging businesses. From a visitor’s perspective, that curated list can look more like a filtered ad than an unbiased recommendation.
2. Lack of Real-Time Insight Today’s travelers are conditioned to check Google reviews, TikTok walk-throughs, and Instagram stories. A printed or static digital guide can’t compete with the immediacy and interactivity of those channels. Without real-time input, guides risk becoming outdated—or worse, irrelevant.
3. Risk of Over-Structuring the Experience Visitor guides often push a tidy, planned narrative. But not every traveler wants a script. Over-curation can alienate free-spirited or return visitors who prefer to wander, discover, and go beyond the "official" highlights. The best guides leave room for personal exploration.
Takeaway for DMOs
A visitor guide should be a starting point, not a finish line. It works best when it's used in concert with digital tools, user-generated content, and real-world experiences. If we think like our visitors, we realize they’re looking for confidence and inspiration—not just a catalog. Let’s use the guide to spark curiosity, while leaving space for serendipity.
---
Let me know if you’d like a call-to-action, social media blurb, or header image to go with this post!
Comments
Post a Comment